Mundic Creek vs Crescent

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mundic Creek (965) sits above Crescent (962). Crescent skews owner-occupied (97%), Mundic Creek runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Mundic Creek or Crescent?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Mundic Creek? The free selling guide

Mundic Creek and Crescent side by side

MeasureMundic CreekCrescent
Renting
Owner occupied59.0%97.0%
Renter occupied–5.0%
Schools
Schools nearby46
Average ICSEA965962
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population30221
Median age5847
Climate
Annual rainfall271 mm266 mm
Mean max, January33.2°C33.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Mundic Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 962). Crescent also has a higher family-household share (80% vs 53%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Mundic Creek vs Crescent: common questions

Does Mundic Creek or Crescent have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mundic Creek scores 965 vs 962 in Crescent. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.