Side by sideSuburb comparison

Norwest vs Baulkham Hills.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Baulkham Hills skews owner-occupied (76%), Norwest runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Baulkham Hills has a heavier family-household mix (83% vs 73%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Norwest
Metric
Baulkham Hills

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$540/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$540/wk
$579/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$520/wk
56.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
40.0%
Renter occupied
22.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
16
10
Transit score
10
100
Bike score
100
4,688
Population
37,415
37
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1111
Avg ICSEA
1111

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).