Payneham vs Royston Park.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Royston Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Royston Park scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 26/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Royston Park (1107) sits above Payneham (1098). Royston Park skews owner-occupied (76%), Payneham runs more rental-dense (54% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Royston Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1107 vs 1098). Royston Park also has a higher family-household share (71% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Does Payneham or Royston Park have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Royston Park scores 1107 vs 1098 in Payneham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Payneham or Royston Park?
Royston Park scores 26/100 on walkability vs 22/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Payneham against another suburb