Squeaking Point vs Shearwater

Shearwater scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 20/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Squeaking Point skews owner-occupied (94%), Shearwater runs more rental-dense (76% owner).

Buying in Squeaking Point or Shearwater?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Squeaking Point? The free selling guide

Squeaking Point and Shearwater side by side

MeasureSqueaking PointShearwater
Renting
House rent$260/wk$260/wk
Unit rent$330/wk$295/wk
Owner occupied94.0%76.0%
Renter occupied6.0%21.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA948948
Lifestyle and people
Walk score020
Transit score00
Bike score50
Population3372,051
Median age4558
Climate
Annual rainfall755 mm711 mm
Mean max, January21.8°C21.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Squeaking Point has a heavier family-household mix (79% vs 66%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Squeaking Point vs Shearwater: common questions

Which is more walkable, Squeaking Point or Shearwater?

Shearwater scores 20/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.