Stone Hut vs Huddleston
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stone Hut (981) sits above Huddleston (946). Stone Hut skews owner-occupied (72%), Huddleston runs more rental-dense (30% owner).
Buying in Stone Hut or Huddleston?
Selling in Stone Hut? The free selling guide
Stone Hut and Huddleston side by side
| Measure | Stone Hut | Huddleston |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 72.0% | 30.0% |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 5 | 12 |
| Average ICSEA | 981 | 946 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Walk score | 0 | 0 |
| Transit score | 0 | 0 |
| Bike score | 10 | 0 |
| Population | 30 | 23 |
| Median age | 69 | 51 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 471 mm | 568 mm |
| Mean max, January | 32.0°C | 31.1°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Stone Hut edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 946). Huddleston also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Stone Hut vs Huddleston: common questions
Does Stone Hut or Huddleston have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stone Hut scores 981 vs 946 in Huddleston. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare Stone Hut with
Choosing between Stone Hut and Huddleston?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.