Three Moon vs Monto

Monto scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Monto (965) sits above Three Moon (960). Three Moon skews owner-occupied (96%), Monto runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

Buying in Three Moon or Monto?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.

Get the free buying guide

Selling in Three Moon? The free selling guide

Three Moon and Monto side by side

Measure	Three Moon	Monto
Renting
Owner occupied	96.0%	64.0%
Renter occupied	9.0%	31.0%
Schools
Schools nearby	4	3
Average ICSEA	960	965
Lifestyle and people
Walk score	0	100
Transit score	0	0
Bike score	0	0
Population	178	1,156
Median age	45	55
Climate
Annual rainfall	664 mm	671 mm
Mean max, January	32.4°C	32.5°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers: We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors: Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families: Monto edges out on average school ICSEA (965 vs 960). Three Moon also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 57%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.