Tucki Tucki vs Codrington

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tucki Tucki (956) sits above Codrington (946). Codrington skews owner-occupied (114%), Tucki Tucki runs more rental-dense (93% owner).

Buying in Tucki Tucki or Codrington?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Tucki Tucki? The free selling guide

Tucki Tucki and Codrington side by side

MeasureTucki TuckiCodrington
Renting
House rent$620/wk–
Unit rent$435/wk–
Owner occupied93.0%114.0%
Renter occupied14.0%14.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA956946
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population12883
Median age5042
Climate
Annual rainfall1268 mm1181 mm
Mean max, January29.6°C29.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Tucki Tucki edges out on average school ICSEA (956 vs 946). Codrington also has a higher family-household share (129% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Tucki Tucki vs Codrington: common questions

Does Tucki Tucki or Codrington have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tucki Tucki scores 956 vs 946 in Codrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.