Tungamull vs Keppel Sands

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Keppel Sands (967) sits above Tungamull (948). Tungamull skews owner-occupied (93%), Keppel Sands runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

Buying in Tungamull or Keppel Sands?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Tungamull? The free selling guide

Tungamull and Keppel Sands side by side

MeasureTungamullKeppel Sands
Renting
Owner occupied93.0%81.0%
Renter occupied3.0%15.0%
Schools
Schools nearby205
Average ICSEA948967
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population429374
Median age4358
Climate
Annual rainfall869 mm848 mm
Mean max, January30.7°C30.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Keppel Sands edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 948). Tungamull also has a higher family-household share (90% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Tungamull vs Keppel Sands: common questions

Does Tungamull or Keppel Sands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Keppel Sands scores 967 vs 948 in Tungamull. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.