Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wolffdene vs Luscombe.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Luscombe edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Luscombe (989) sits above Wolffdene (984).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Luscombe edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 984).

Common questionsWolffdene vs Luscombe

Common questions

Does Wolffdene or Luscombe have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Luscombe scores 989 vs 984 in Wolffdene. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Wolffdene
Metric
Luscombe

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
91.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
266
Population
265
50
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
984
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).