Side by sideSuburb comparison

Murtho vs Crescent.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Murtho edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Murtho (966) sits above Crescent (962). Crescent skews owner-occupied (97%), Murtho runs more rental-dense (46% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murtho edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 962).

Common questionsMurtho vs Crescent

Common questions

Does Murtho or Crescent have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Murtho scores 966 vs 962 in Crescent. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Murtho
Metric
Crescent

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$246/wk
46.0%
Owner occupied
97.0%
35.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
195
Population
221
47
Median age
47

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
6
966
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).